Case type IVF & Fertility Treatment Injuries

Embryo Mix-Ups

A gloved hand places a culture dish under a laboratory microscope.

Did you learn that the embryo transferred during your IVF treatment was not yours, or that your embryo went to someone else? Tell us your story.

CBW Law reviews embryo mix-up claims for patients and families across the country, including parents who carried a pregnancy that was not genetically theirs and parents whose embryo was given to another patient. We listen, help gather the records, and explain what the facts may support. Tell Us Your Story. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Tell Us Your Story Call (800) 476-2416

An embryo mix-up is one of the most serious errors that can happen during IVF. It can mean a patient carries a pregnancy that is not genetically hers, or that a family’s embryo is placed in a stranger. These errors are thought to be rare, but the true number is unknown, and most cases are never reported publicly.1 When one does happen, the records kept by the clinic and its lab are usually where the answers start.

What an embryo mix-up is

In IVF, eggs and sperm are joined in a lab dish. The embryos that grow are placed in the uterus a few days later, or frozen for later use.10 Each embryo has to stay linked to the right patient at every step, sometimes for years. An embryo mix-up happens when that link breaks and the wrong embryo is thawed, chosen or transferred.1

Medical journals often call this a wrong embryo transfer. Reported cases and case reviews describe several forms:28

  • A patient receives another patient’s embryo during a fresh or frozen transfer
  • A patient’s own embryo is transferred to someone else
  • The wrong frozen embryo is taken from storage and thawed
  • Embryos for several patients are prepared on the same day and one is handed over for the wrong person
  • Storage records do not match the embryos actually in the tank

An embryo mix-up is different from a sperm mix-up or an egg mix-up. In those cases, the wrong sperm or egg is used to create the embryo. In an embryo mix-up, the embryo may have been created correctly and then ended up with the wrong patient. It is also different from fertility fraud, where a provider knowingly uses sperm the patient never agreed to. Genetic testing and lab records can help show which of these happened.1

How an embryo mix-up can happen

Specialists who study these events say a wrong transfer is seldom a single slip in the transfer room. More often it is the end point of several failures in the chain that tracks each embryo.1 That chain can break at many points:

  • When samples are first logged into the lab
  • When dishes, tubes and storage devices are labeled
  • During freezing, storage or thawing
  • During embryo selection or biopsy
  • In handoffs between staff or shifts
  • In communication between the lab and the doctor

Researchers at Germany’s national regulator for tissues and cells reviewed five embryo mix-ups reported by five clinics between 2022 and 2024. Every one came from misidentifying the patient, the embryo, or the match between the two.2 In three cases, staff did not properly confirm who the patient was. In one, the right patient was in the room, but the wrong embryo was handed over on a day when embryos for several patients were being prepared. In another, the wrong sample was taken from a liquid nitrogen tank and never compared with the patient before transfer. A late arrival, a language barrier and a heavy workload were among the factors listed.2

Identification safeguards and professional standards

Fertility labs use layers of checks to keep each embryo with the right patient. In 2026, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and the Society of Reproductive Biologists and Technologists published joint guidance on witnessing in IVF labs. It identifies key points where misidentification can occur, describes manual and electronic witnessing, and explains how to grade and report protocol deviations.3

Common identification safeguards

Double witnessing
A second trained person checks names and labels at critical steps, including freezing, warming and transfer. Manual witnessing can fail when staff are tired, interrupted or short-handed.1
Electronic witnessing
Barcodes or radio-frequency tags let a system flag mismatched samples in the same workstation. A Belgian program that used one for more than 10 years found it worked when used correctly, but individual embryos could not be tagged, so manual checks were still needed at some steps.4
Patient identification
European good-practice guidance says patients should be asked directly for at least their full name and date of birth before procedures such as embryo transfer.2
Read-back before transfer
A review of U.S. embryo mix-up lawsuits recommended a two-step read-back before transfer and genetic testing when records show a discrepancy.6
Disclosure
ASRM’s ethics committee says providers have an ethical duty to disclose clinically significant errors involving gametes and embryos, and that clinics should have written policies for reducing and disclosing errors.5

These are professional standards, not federal rules. NBC News reported in 2025 that clinics are not required to report IVF errors to federal or state agencies, that no national database tracks them, and that electronic tracking systems are not federally mandated.9

Reported embryo mix-up cases and lawsuits

Only some embryo mix-ups become public. The events below were reported by independent news organizations. Where a lawsuit is described, its claims are allegations unless a court has decided them.

Selected reported cases

  1. December 2023

    Krystena Murray, a patient of Coastal Fertility Specialists in Georgia, gave birth after IVF with donor sperm. A DNA test later confirmed the baby was not biologically hers, and the clinic identified his genetic parents, who lived in another state.7

  2. May 2024

    After the genetic parents sought custody, Ms. Murray gave up custody of the boy she had raised for about five months.79

  3. February 2025

    Ms. Murray sued the clinic. In a statement, the clinic said it deeply regretted the distress caused by an extremely rare human error and that it had added human witnessing and a digital witnessing system.79

  4. February–April 2025

    Monash IVF in Brisbane, Australia, found one more embryo in storage than expected when a family asked to move their embryos to another provider. Its investigation found another patient’s embryo had been incorrectly thawed and transferred to the mother, who had given birth. The company apologized publicly and reported the incident to regulators.8

  5. March 2025

    ABC News reported that Daphna and Alexander Cardinale of Los Angeles learned through DNA testing that their embryo had been switched with another couple’s. The families exchanged the babies at about four months old. The Cardinales sued their clinic and reached a private settlement.7

A 2021 review of U.S. court records and news coverage from 2000 to 2020 found that improper labeling and poor communication led to the errors in the cases it studied.6 An NBC News analysis of lawsuits filed from 2019 to 2024 counted 13 over swapped embryos, eggs or sperm. Across all the IVF lawsuits in that analysis, few went to trial, and most of those resolved were settled or dismissed.9

How embryo mix-ups are discovered

Some errors are caught within minutes. In four of the five German cases, staff noticed right after the transfer.2 Others come to light months or years later. Families have learned of mix-ups through:

  • Prenatal testing, or testing after birth, that does not match the intended parents1
  • DNA tests the family ordered on their own7
  • An embryo count that does not match the clinic’s storage records8
  • A call from the clinic after an internal investigation8
  • Genetic testing of embryos that compares them with the parents’ DNA1

How a child looks is not proof of a mix-up either way. Genetic testing and the lab’s records are what answer the question. Some specialists have proposed comparing embryo DNA with the intended parents before transfer when embryos are already being genetically tested, but they note this is not yet common practice.1

The medical, emotional and family consequences

An embryo mix-up always affects at least two families: the patient who received the wrong embryo and the patient for whom it was intended.2 The harm can include:

  • Medical steps to prevent or end a pregnancy after the error is found2
  • A pregnancy the patient did not choose, and hard decisions about it2
  • Custody and parentage disputes between the birth family and the genetic family17
  • Loss of a family’s only remaining embryo2
  • Grief and trauma, sometimes requiring psychological support2
  • Gaps in a child’s medical and family history
  • The cost and strain of starting IVF again

Who is a child’s legal parent after a mix-up depends on state law. Depending on the state and on notice, the woman who carried the pregnancy may or may not be treated as the legal mother.1 In some states, newer abortion laws may also affect the choices available when a mix-up is found during pregnancy, and those questions are unresolved.1 The legal status of embryos also varies by jurisdiction.

When to talk to an IVF lawyer about an embryo mix-up

You do not need to know what went wrong before you reach out. An IVF lawyer looks at the facts, the records and the law of the state where treatment happened. A claim review may consider:

  • How and when the mix-up was discovered, and who told you
  • Genetic test results, and who ordered them
  • What the clinic disclosed, and when5
  • The identification and witnessing steps used on the days in question
  • Any incident report or root cause analysis
  • Whether a pregnancy or birth occurred, and any custody case
  • Whether your clinic agreement requires arbitration9
  • Which state’s law applies, and how much time remains

Embryo mix-up claims may be framed as negligence, medical malpractice, breach of contract or consumer protection claims.1 There is no single, established legal claim for a swapped embryo, so how a case is framed matters.9 A lawsuit is one possible path. A review helps you learn whether it is a realistic one for you.

Who may be responsible

Responsibility depends on where the chain broke, and sometimes an error that starts in one place is missed in another. Depending on the facts, a review may look at:

  • The fertility clinic and the people who manage it
  • The physician who performed or oversaw the transfer
  • The embryology lab, if it is separate from the clinic
  • A storage facility that held the frozen embryos
  • A genetic testing lab, if biopsy samples or reports were mislabeled

No one is presumed responsible; the records decide that. When the problem involves mislabeled test samples, see embryo genetic testing sample mix-ups. For broader lab failures, see IVF laboratory errors.

An embryo mix-up is not a bad outcome of IVF. It is an identification failure, and families deserve to know how it happened.

Filing deadlines for an embryo mix-up lawsuit

Every state limits how long you have to file a lawsuit, and some limits are short. The deadline can depend on whether the claim is treated as medical malpractice, negligence or breach of contract, on when the mix-up was discovered, and on who is being sued.

California is one example. A professional negligence claim against a health care provider generally must be filed within three years of the injury, or one year after the patient discovered or reasonably should have discovered it, whichever comes first.11 The three-year outer limit can be extended only for specific reasons, such as fraud or intentional concealment.11 California also requires at least 90 days’ written notice to the provider before such a lawsuit can start.12

Other states use different time periods, discovery rules and pre-suit steps, and some clocks can start before you knew anything was wrong. If you suspect an embryo mix-up, talking with an attorney early helps protect your options.

Tell Us Your Story →

Records that can show what happened

You can request many of these records yourself. Keep copies of everything, including emails and patient portal messages.

Records worth requesting

Clinic and transfer records

  • Consent and embryo disposition forms
  • Embryo transfer record and procedure notes
  • Patient identification or time-out checklist
  • Embryo inventory and storage location records

Laboratory records

  • Embryology worksheets and dish labels
  • Witnessing logs, manual or electronic
  • Freezing and thawing records
  • Incident reports and corrective action records

Testing, messages and bills

  • Prenatal, newborn or DNA test results
  • Embryo genetic testing reports, if any
  • Letters, emails and portal messages from the clinic
  • Billing statements and explanation of benefits forms

What happens after you contact CBW Law

What to expect

  1. Tell us what happened

    Share what you know in your own words. Approximate dates and the clinic’s name are enough to start.

  2. We listen and ask questions

    We ask about the treatment, how the mix-up came to light and any testing. You decide how much to share.

  3. Records review

    With your permission, we request clinic, lab and testing records and look for where identification broke down.

  4. Legal review

    We look at the deadlines and laws that apply in your state and explain your options plainly. A review is not a promise that a claim can be filed or that anyone will be held responsible.

Plain English

Medical, Health & Insurance

Clinic records, lab logs and insurance letters use their own vocabulary. These are the terms that come up most often in an embryo mix-up review.

IVF steps

In vitro fertilization (IVF)
Joining eggs and sperm in a lab dish rather than inside the body.10
Embryo transfer
Placing one or more embryos into the uterus through a thin tube passed through the cervix.10
Frozen embryo transfer
A transfer using an embryo that was frozen earlier and thawed for the procedure. Unused embryos may be frozen for later use.10

Lab and identification terms

Witnessing
A check, by a second person or an electronic system, that the right sample and the right patient are matched at a critical step.13
Electronic witnessing system
Barcodes or radio-frequency tags that let software warn staff when samples that do not match are in the same work area.4
Chain of custody
The record that links a patient to her eggs, sperm, embryos, storage devices and paperwork over time.1
Root cause analysis
A structured investigation after an error that looks for every step and condition that allowed it to happen.1

Genetic and family terms

Genetic parent
The person whose egg or sperm created the embryo.
Gestational parent
The person who carries the pregnancy and gives birth, who may not be genetically related to the child.
Noninvasive prenatal paternity testing
A blood test during pregnancy that can check whether a fetus is related to the intended parents. Specialists have suggested it as a way to find mix-ups earlier.1

Insurance and billing terms

Explanation of benefits (EOB)
A statement from a health plan listing what was billed and what it paid. It is not a bill, but it can help show dates and places of treatment.
Itemized statement
A bill that lists each service separately, such as lab fees, storage fees and transfer fees.
Arbitration agreement
A contract term that sends disputes to a private decision-maker instead of a court. Many IVF patients sign one.9

Questions

Frequently asked embryo mix-up questions

Short answers to the questions families ask most often.

What is an embryo mix-up?

An embryo mix-up happens when an embryo created during IVF is transferred to the wrong patient, or when a patient’s own embryo is given to someone else. It is an identification error, not a biological outcome. The embryo itself may have been created correctly, but the link between the embryo and the patient broke somewhere along the way, in the lab, in storage or in the transfer room.1

How common are embryo mix-ups?

No one knows for sure. Specialists writing in 2026 said the true number is unknown and most cases are never reported publicly.1 U.S. clinics are not required to report errors to federal or state agencies, and no national database tracks them.9 The cases that become public are likely only part of the picture.

How would I know if my embryo was transferred to someone else?

Often you would not know unless the clinic tells you or records reveal it. In the Brisbane case, the error surfaced when staff found an extra embryo while preparing to move a family’s embryos to another clinic.8 ASRM’s ethics committee says providers have an ethical duty to disclose clinically significant errors like this.5 If your embryo count or records seem wrong, ask for an explanation in writing.

Does a baby who looks different from us mean there was a mix-up?

Not by itself. Family resemblance is an unreliable guide. Many genes shape traits like eye color, and parents with blue eyes can, though uncommonly, have a child with brown eyes.13 In the reported cases, it was a DNA test that confirmed the mix-up.7 If you have doubts, a confirmed test result is the place to start.

What should a clinic do after it discovers an embryo mix-up?

ASRM’s ethics committee calls for immediate disclosure to all recipients, patients and unknowing donors affected, whether or not a pregnancy occurred, along with a root cause analysis.1 It also says clinics should have written policies for reducing and disclosing errors.5 What a clinic actually did, and when, can matter in a later claim review.

Who is the legal parent after an embryo mix-up?

It depends on the state. Parentage rules differ. Depending on state law and notice issues, the woman who carried the pregnancy may or may not be treated as the legal mother.1 In some reported cases, genetic parents have been granted parental rights.2 A family lawyer in your state can explain how parentage law may apply. That question is separate from whether the clinic may be liable.

What if the mix-up was caught before a pregnancy?

It can still cause real harm. In the German cases, staff caught most errors right after transfer, but patients still needed medical steps to prevent a pregnancy, and one family was left with no embryo for their own transfer.2 Whether a claim makes sense depends on what was lost, what treatment followed and the law of your state.

Can I file an embryo mix-up lawsuit if I signed an arbitration agreement?

Possibly, but the agreement may change where the claim is heard. Many IVF patients sign agreements to resolve disputes through arbitration rather than in court.9 Whether that clause applies, and whether it can be challenged, depends on its wording and on state law. Bring a copy of your clinic contract to any legal review.

How is an embryo mix-up different from a sperm or egg mix-up?

In a sperm or egg mix-up, the wrong sperm or egg is used to create the embryo. In an embryo mix-up, the embryo may have been created correctly but was then transferred to the wrong patient. The difference affects which records matter and which steps failed. Genetic testing can help show which kind of error happened.1

How long do I have to file an embryo mix-up lawsuit?

It depends on your state and the type of claim. In California, for example, a professional negligence claim against a health care provider generally must be filed within three years of the injury or one year after discovery, whichever comes first.11 Other states use different rules, so it helps to speak with an attorney as soon as you suspect a problem.

Tell Us Your Story

An embryo mix-up can change a family’s life in ways no one planned. Whether it came from a labeling error, a skipped check or a breakdown in communication, the clinic and lab records are usually where the answers start.

If you believe an embryo was transferred to the wrong patient, or your embryo went to someone else, we would like to hear from you. Tell us your story, and we will help you understand what the facts may support.

Tell Us Your Story Call (800) 476-2416

This page is general information about embryo mix-ups. It is not legal or medical advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. An unsuccessful cycle, a complication, an embryo loss or a testing limitation does not, by itself, establish that anyone was negligent. No outcome can be promised in any case.

Keep reading

Embryo mix-up resources

Official and patient-support pages about IVF and how reproductive tissue is regulated.

Government

In vitro fertilization (IVF), MedlinePlus

The National Library of Medicine’s plain-language guide to the steps of IVF.

Government

Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), NICHD

The National Institutes of Health overview of IVF, donation and gestational carriers.

Government

What You Should Know: Reproductive Tissue Donation, FDA

How the FDA regulates establishments that handle donated eggs and sperm.

Professional guidance

ReproductiveFacts.org, American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Patient education from the main U.S. professional society for fertility care.

Patient support

RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association

Support groups and education for people facing infertility.

Apparatus

Sources & Cited Articles

The source material behind each factual, medical and legal statement on this page, numbered to match the markers in the text.

  1. The in vitro fertilization clinic’s worst nightmare: wrong embryo transfer; new considerationsOry SJ, Ivani K, Miller K, Crockin SL · F&S Reports 2026;7(3):173-176Cited for the unknown true incidence of wrong embryo transfer; the chain-of-custody points where failures originate; wrong transfer as a systems failure; limits of manual witnessing; PGT-based genetic relatedness checks not yet being common practice; discovery through prenatal testing or after birth; legal theories (negligence, malpractice, contract, consumer protection); parentage varying by state and notice; unresolved post-Dobbs questions; ASRM’s call for immediate disclosure and root cause analysis; and noninvasive prenatal paternity testing.
  2. Embryo mix-up due to erroneous identification in the context of medically assisted reproductionAmoah FN, Kehr S, Müller S, Funk MB, Berg P (Paul-Ehrlich-Institut) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2026;43(7):2087-2092Cited for the five German embryo mix-ups reported 2022-2024 and their causes (patient misidentification, wrong embryo handed over, wrong sample from the tank, workload, late arrival, language barrier); errors noticed right after transfer in four of five cases; medical steps and outcomes; two families affected in every case; loss of a family’s only embryo; preventability; the ESHRE patient-identification recommendation; and genetic parents granted rights in some jurisdictions.
  3. Witnessing and protocol deviations in the in vitro fertilization and andrology laboratory: a committee opinionPractice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society of Reproductive Biologists and Technologists · Fertility and Sterility 2026;126(1):38-48Cited for current U.S. professional guidance describing misidentification risk points, manual and electronic witnessing, and grading and reporting of protocol deviations.
  4. Electronic witnessing in the medically assisted reproduction laboratory: insights and considerations after 10 years of useSterckx J, Wouters K, Mateizel I, et al. · Human Reproduction 2023;38(8):1529-1537Cited for how electronic witnessing flags mismatched samples, its effectiveness when used correctly, and the finding that individual embryos could not be tagged, so manual witnessing remained necessary at some steps.
  5. Disclosure of medical errors and untoward events involving gametes and embryos: an Ethics Committee opinionEthics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine · Fertility and Sterility 2024;122(5):814-820Cited for the ethical duty to disclose clinically significant errors involving gametes and embryos and the recommendation that clinics have written policies for reducing and disclosing errors.
  6. Liability for embryo mix-ups in fertility practices in the USARasouli MA, Moutos CP, Phelps JY · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2021;38(5):1101-1107Cited for the finding that improper labeling and ineffective communication led to the errors in the 2000-2020 U.S. cases reviewed, and for the recommended two-step read-back before transfer and genetic testing when records show a discrepancy.
  7. Inside IVF mix-ups that left women carrying embryos that weren’t theirsABC News (Louallen D, Rosenbaum R, Coburn L, Chevalier Z) · ABC News, March 7, 2025Cited for the Murray case (December 2023 birth, DNA confirmation, genetic parents identified, custody given up after about five months, lawsuit, clinic statement and added witnessing) and the Cardinale case (DNA testing, embryo switch, babies exchanged at about four months, lawsuit and private settlement).
  8. Australian IVF clinic admits embryo mix-upAFP, via RFI · RFI, April 11, 2025Cited for the Monash IVF Brisbane case: discovery in February 2025 when staff found an extra embryo, the finding that another patient’s embryo was incorrectly thawed and transferred, the public apology, notice to patients and reporting to regulators.
  9. After IVF nightmares, patients have few protectionsNBC News (Bendix A, Abou-Sabe K, Chaidez A, Sridhar P, Barber E) · NBC News, March 19, 2025Cited for the 13 lawsuits over swapped embryos, eggs or sperm (2019-2024), most resolved cases being settled or dismissed, no required error reporting or national database, electronic tracking not being federally mandated, no established legal claim for swapped embryos, arbitration agreements, and Ms. Murray giving up custody in May and suing the month before the report.
  10. In vitro fertilization (IVF)MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine · Medical Encyclopedia, reviewed March 17, 2026Cited for the basic steps of IVF, embryo transfer, and the freezing of unused embryos.
  11. California Code of Civil Procedure § 340.5California Legislature · California Legislative InformationCited for California’s time limit for professional negligence claims against health care providers (three years from injury or one year from discovery, whichever is first) and its limited tolling for fraud and intentional concealment.
  12. California Code of Civil Procedure § 364California Legislature · California Legislative InformationCited for California’s requirement of at least 90 days’ prior notice before a professional negligence action against a health care provider.
  13. Is eye color determined by genetics?MedlinePlus Genetics, U.S. National Library of Medicine · MedlinePlus GeneticsCited for the point that several genes shape eye color and that, although uncommon, parents with blue eyes can have children with brown eyes, so appearance is an unreliable guide to genetic parentage.

Accountability

Reviewed by

Craig Weiss, founder and managing attorney of CBW Law Firm

Craig Weiss

Managing Attorney · CBW Law

View full profile →

Attorney advertising. The content of this website may be considered attorney advertising under the rules of certain jurisdictions. The information on this website is for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. Viewing this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statutes, regulations and case law change, and the law differs from state to state.