Case type Defective Medical Devices

Surgical Stapler & Clip Injuries

Stainless steel surgical clamps and scissors on a white surface.

A leak, bleeding or emergency surgery after a stapler or clip failed? Tell us your story.

CBW Law reviews claims from people hurt when a surgical stapler, reload or clip may have failed during an operation. Tell Us Your Story. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Tell Us Your Story Call (800) 476-2416

Surgical staplers cut and seal tissue inside the body, and clips close off vessels. When a stapler misfires or a staple line opens, the result can be bleeding, leaks, sepsis and emergency surgery. The FDA tightened its rules on staplers in 2021 after reviewing reported problems, and several stapler reloads have been recalled since. A surgical stapler lawyer looks at the device, the lot and what surgeons found.

Staplers, staples and clips are different devices

Internal surgical staplers cut and seal tissue during operations. Surgeons use them to remove part of an organ, to cut through and seal tissue and vessels, and to join structures together, called an anastomosis1. A stapler system has the stapler itself, a reload or cartridge holding the staples, and the staples left in the body. Clips are a separate device family, applied with their own applier to close off vessels or ducts.

A claim has to identify which piece was involved: the stapler, the cartridge, the staples, the clip or the clip applier.

What can go wrong with a surgical stapler

The FDA's 2021 labeling guidance lists some of the most commonly reported problems2:

  • The staple line opening
  • Malformed staples
  • Misfiring, difficulty firing or failure to fire
  • Misapplied staples, such as staples applied to the wrong tissue or staples of the wrong size

The FDA says stapler or staple malfunctions may lead to longer operations, unplanned additional surgery, bleeding, sepsis, fistula formation, tearing of internal tissues and organs, and death2. Some of those problems come from the device and some from how it was used. The guidance itself counts misapplied staples, a use error, among the reported problems.

Because of the reported harms, the FDA reclassified internal surgical staplers from Class I to Class II in October 2021, requiring 510(k) clearance and special controls, and issued labeling recommendations1.

FDA actions on staplers

  1. March 2019

    FDA letter to health care providers on safe use of staplers1.

  2. May 30, 2019

    Advisory panel meets to discuss reclassification.

  3. October 2021

    Final order reclassifies internal staplers to Class II; final labeling guidance issued.

Recent stapler recalls

Ethicon corrected certain Endopath Echelon Vascular White Reloads because of an inadvertent lockout: the device may briefly activate without cutting or stapling, and the team must take extra steps to open it and remove it from tissue. The FDA notice reports one death and one injury3.

In 2026, Intuitive Surgical recalled 8 mm SureForm 30 Gray reloads used with its robotic stapler after reports of incomplete staple lines on blood vessels, with four serious injuries and one death reported as of Feb. 23, 20264.

Staplers at a glance

Common problems
Staple-line opening, malformed staples, misfires2.
Possible harm
Bleeding, leaks, sepsis, more surgery.
Regulation
Class II since October 20211.
Key question
Device malfunction or use, size or compatibility?

Ligating clips

Clips raise their own questions. In 2006, Teleflex recalled Weck Hem-o-lok ligating clips after reports that clips came loose after tying off the kidney artery in laparoscopic surgery to remove a kidney from a living donor. The clips are now contraindicated for that specific use. That recall was terminated in 20075. It applied to one procedure, and it doesn't mean every clip or every use is unsafe.

Malfunction or something else?

After surgery, a leak or bleeding can have several causes. A review looks at whether:

  • The operative report notes a misfire, a lockout or an incomplete staple line
  • The right staple size and reload were used for the tissue
  • The stapler and reload were compatible
  • The tissue was swollen, thin or diseased
  • A repair surgery found staples that didn't form properly

A postoperative leak doesn't by itself show that a stapler was defective. The device identity, lot number and what the surgeons saw are the key evidence.

Who may have a stapler or clip claim

  • An anastomotic leak or staple-line failure that needed emergency surgery
  • Serious bleeding after a staple line or clip failed
  • Sepsis, a fistula or a colostomy after a device problem
  • A device from a recalled lot
  • A long hospital stay or lasting harm after the failure

Who may be responsible

An investigation may look at the maker of the stapler, reload or clip, based on the device records, recalls and surgical findings. Device selection and technique are reviewed separately as medical malpractice questions.

Filing deadlines for surgical stapler lawsuits

Deadlines depend on your state and on when you learned of the injury and its possible cause. Examples:

  • Arizona: generally two years for personal injury and wrongful death6.
  • California: two years for injury to or death of a person caused by another's wrongful act or neglect7.
  • New York: three years for personal injury8, with a separate rule that runs from discovery for injuries caused by the latent effects of exposure to a substance in the body9.
  • Texas: two years for personal injury and wrongful death10, and most product liability claims must be brought within 15 years of the product's sale11.

Claims against hospitals and surgeons often have shorter deadlines and notice rules. Devices are often thrown away after surgery, so ask a surgical stapler attorney to check your dates and request records early.

Tell Us Your Story →

Records that help a stapler or clip review

Records worth gathering

Surgery

  • Operative report
  • Device and reload names, staple size and lot numbers
  • Any notes of a misfire or malfunction

Complications

  • Imaging showing a leak or bleeding
  • Reoperation report
  • Pathology

Recovery

  • Hospital and ICU records
  • Ostomy or wound care records

What happens after you contact CBW Law

How a review works

  1. Tell us what happened

    Share what you remember about the device, the problem and the treatment that followed. You do not need every record first.

  2. We identify the device

    We work to confirm the maker, model and lot or serial number, and whether any recall or safety notice covers it.

  3. We gather records

    With your permission, we request operative reports, imaging, device data and other records from your providers.

  4. We explain what we see

    We tell you what the records show, what questions remain and what options may be open, including deadlines.

A leak or bleed after surgery is not, by itself, proof of a defective stapler. The device, the lot and the surgical findings come first.

Plain English

Medical, Health & Insurance

Terms you may see in a stapler or clip case.

Device terms

Reload
A replaceable cartridge of staples.
Ligating clip
A clip used to close off a blood vessel or duct.
Lockout
A safety feature that stops a stapler from firing; it can also engage when it shouldn't3.

Complications

Anastomosis
A surgical connection between two structures, such as two ends of bowel1.
Anastomotic leak
A leak where two structures were joined.
Sepsis
A life-threatening reaction to infection.

Procedures

Reoperation
A return to the operating room to fix a problem.

Questions

Surgical stapler lawsuit questions

Short answers to the questions people ask first.

Did the stapler misfire, or was a clip involved?

The operative report usually identifies the device. A surgical stapler lawyer can help sort out which one.

Does a leak after surgery prove the stapler was defective?

No. Leaks have several possible causes. A review looks for a device problem in the records.

What are the most common stapler problems?

The FDA lists staple-line opening, malformed staples, misfiring, failure to fire and misapplied staples.

Was the recall current or historical?

Check the dates. The Hem-o-lok clip recall, for example, ended in 2007 and applied to one procedure.

Are surgical staplers regulated more strictly now?

Yes. In 2021 the FDA moved internal staplers to Class II, requiring 510(k) clearance and special controls.

Do I need a surgical stapler attorney if I needed emergency surgery?

An emergency reoperation is important evidence. A surgical stapler attorney can review it.

Is a stapler claim a malpractice claim?

It can be a product claim, a malpractice claim or both.

How long do I have to file a surgical stapler lawsuit?

It depends on your state and the type of claim. Some deadlines are short.

What records matter most?

The operative report, device lot numbers and the reoperation report.

What does it cost to contact CBW Law?

Telling us your story costs nothing, and contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Tell Us Your Story

If a surgical stapler or clip failed and you were hurt, a surgical stapler attorney can review what happened.

Tell us what happened. CBW Law will review your information and explain what we see. Submitting information does not establish an attorney-client relationship or guarantee representation.

Tell Us Your Story Call (800) 476-2416

This page is general information about surgical stapler and clip injuries. It is not legal or medical advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. A leak, bleeding or recall does not, by itself, establish that a device was defective or that anyone is legally responsible. Laws and deadlines differ by state, and no outcome can be promised.

Keep reading

Official resources

Government sources for device recalls, safety notices and reporting.

Government

Medical Device Recalls and Early Alerts, FDA

The FDA's list of serious device recalls.

Government

Report a device problem (MedWatch), FDA

Tell the FDA about a problem with a device.

Government

Surgical Staplers and Staples, FDA

FDA actions on staplers.

Apparatus

Sources & Cited Articles

The source material behind each factual, medical and legal statement on this page, numbered to match the markers in the text.

  1. Surgical Staplers and StaplesU.S. Food and Drug Administration · FDA.gov, content current as of Oct. 7, 2021; verified Nov 12, 2026Uses of internal staplers; FDA letters of March 2019 and October 2021; October 2021 reclassification of internal staplers from Class I to Class II and labeling guidance.
  2. Surgical Staplers and Staples for Internal Use - Labeling Recommendations (guidance)U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Final guidance, Oct. 8, 2021; verified Nov 12, 2026Most commonly reported problems include staple-line opening, malformed staples, misfiring, difficulty firing, failure to fire and misapplied staples; malfunctions may cause bleeding, sepsis, fistula, tissue tearing, added surgery and death.
  3. Disposable Surgical Stapler Cartridge Correction: Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC Issues Correction for Endopath Echelon Vascular White ReloadU.S. Food and Drug Administration · FDA recall notice, content current as of July 25, 2025; verified Nov 12, 2026Inadvertent lockout: the device may activate without cutting or stapling and needs extra steps to release; one death and one injury reported.
  4. Surgical Stapler Reload Recall: Intuitive Surgical Removes 8mm SureForm 30 Gray ReloadsU.S. Food and Drug Administration · FDA recall notice, content current as of May 5, 2026; verified Nov 12, 2026Incomplete staple lines on blood vessels after the da Vinci system reports a completed fire; bleeding that may require conversion to open surgery; four serious injuries and one death reported as of Feb. 23, 2026.
  5. Class 2 Device Recall: Weck Hem-o-lok XL Polymer Ligating Clips (Z-1098-06)U.S. Food and Drug Administration · FDA recall database, initiated Apr. 12, 2006; terminated Nov. 14, 2007; verified Nov 12, 2026Clips could dislodge after renal artery ligation in laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy; now contraindicated for that use.
  6. A.R.S. § 12-542Arizona State Legislature · Arizona Revised Statutes; verified Nov 12, 2026Two years for injury to the person and for wrongful death.
  7. Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1California Legislature · California Code; verified Nov 12, 2026Two years for injury to or death of an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another.
  8. Civil Practice Law and Rules § 214New York State Senate · Consolidated Laws of New York; verified Nov 12, 2026Three years for personal injury.
  9. Civil Practice Law and Rules § 214-cNew York State Senate · Consolidated Laws of New York; verified Nov 12, 2026Latent effects of exposure to a substance: three years computed from discovery of the injury.
  10. Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 16.003Texas Legislature · Texas Statutes; verified Nov 12, 2026Two years for personal injury and wrongful death.
  11. Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 16.012Texas Legislature · Texas Statutes; verified Nov 12, 2026Products liability actions within 15 years of sale, with an exception for certain latent diseases from exposure.

Accountability

Reviewed by

Craig Weiss, founder and managing attorney of CBW Law Firm

Craig Weiss

Managing Attorney · CBW Law

View full profile →

Attorney advertising. The content of this website may be considered attorney advertising under the rules of certain jurisdictions. The information on this website is for general information purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. Viewing this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statutes, regulations and case law change, and the law differs from state to state.